I'm trying :) it's tough, but it's what's getting me up in the morning
and i've had my good feedback too at times.

ps: @fabrizio, we live in the same country (my email address might've
been misleading). we both now the drill.

On Dec 2, 10:16 am, "Fabrizio Giudici" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:07:39 +0100, [email protected]
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > just a note:
>
> > i was never talking about "technology for technology sake".
>
> > all my "let's try..." thingies came from making stuff better (be it
> > faster processes, automated ones, better performance and so on).
>
> Are you able to translate all these good intentions into an internal
> report that *proves* that better technology makes more money for the
> company (again, sorry about that, but the company is not primarily
> interested in the frustration of developers, is interested in making more
> money. And developers aren't necessarily the only frustrated class of
> employees in a company. Sure, less frustrated employees might trigger
> efficiency improvements, but again this must be proved). Translated, this
> means: are you able to talk in the business language?
>
> --
> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
> Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
> [email protected]http://tidalwave.it-http://fabriziogiudici.it

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to