You might be better off looking for a "corporate" decompiler that you pay for. That way you can hit them with bug requests and get things fixed up or changed as needed. You will be doing decompiling on a massive scale it sounds like and there are bound to be problems. If you choose one that can be modified or that has support, you will probably have better results when the problems show up.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > I usually resort to JD [http://java.decompiler.free.fr/] when I need to > satisfy my curiosity. Not sure it's the best but it has worked for me in > the past. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/EFtzCIi1vOsJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Robert Casto www.robertcasto.com www.sellerstoolbox.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
