That would be my advice too. If the field of Java decompilers were vibrant and active, I wouldn't have a problem recommending commercial software but the state of decompilers seems to be pretty dire, so personally, I'd pick an open source decompiler and be ready to make a few patches if necessary.
-- Cédric On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Robert Casto <[email protected]>wrote: > See if there is something open source available. Your "pay" would be to > engineers or consultants then instead. But at least you have a chance to > improve the output and resolve issues. > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Duncan McGregor < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> JAD isn't even nailed to the perch very well these days. >> >> I don't have a large volume to chew through, although one method does >> manage to nest 22 levels deep in 1300 lines! >> >> I'd be happy to pay, but I haven't stumbled upon any promising >> commercial offerings.... >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > Robert Casto > www.robertcasto.com > www.sellerstoolbox.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
