On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:16:00 +0100, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>
wrote:
You must admit though, higher-kinded types are a good example of the
kind of
abstraction under discussion here.
I thought they were, though I have to cede that it will almost
undeniably land us in the realm of discussing Scala. So I can
understand wanting to avoid it.
Just to be clear: I don't want to "avoid discussing" about Scala :-) Is
that we know we have different opinions on Scala, or other languages,
while leaving the language alone I think we can get on a broader consensus
on the current topic.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
[email protected]
http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
