On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > In any case, this doesn't change a lot in my point of view. Desktop > applications can be distributed by embedding a Java runtime, so they are not > impaired by the fact that the user disables Java.
I'm curious about the security implications of this practice. Seems like this can make a bad problem worse. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
