Let me be more precise here. You can't very well write much Java code, 
without needing to implement an interface or an abstract class. the 
AWT/Swing even system comes to mind and one of the most obvious parts of 
the API. So where would you draw the line... only allowed to implement 
interfaces and use base classes? Where is this stated/formulated?

How about if you think of the Java runtime as one giant SPI... except 
apparently you are only allowed to come with drop-in supplements, not 
replacements - even if you refrain from calling your work "Java". Are we 
only allowed to augment JDBC, JCE, JNDI, JAXP, JBI, Java Sound, ImageIO 
which have been designed specifically for third part drop-ins? Again, where 
is this stated/formulated?

The problem once again comes from the fact that Java is openly developer 
(which is nice) but *not* a standard (which sucks). Had Java been 
standardized under ECMA/ISO, this whole copyright case would be moot from 
the get go. Any verdict against Google could be seen as having wide effect 
on the industry, i.e. Microsoft would be free to go after Wine developers 
etc. etc.


On Monday, May 7, 2012 11:08:55 PM UTC+2, Casper Bang wrote:
>
> > Using Java != releasing an alternate implementation. It seems that the 
> > author of the article is well positioned to win the FUD prize of the 
> year. 
> > 
> That's a fine line though! Embrace + extend = use, and in all other 
> sciences, that's how progress is made. In many ways this is version 2 
> of Sun vs. MS, and even if Sun won the first one, they lost the war. I 
> also have a very hard time seeing how Oracle could win this one... the 
> battle, perhaps... but not the war.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/dVDiXl-0_PIJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to