Not so fast. Here are some more recent tidbits: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120507122749740#Update_7
Judge: Google have proven that Sun and/or Oracle engaged in conduct Sun and/or Oracle knew or should have known would reasonably lead Google to believe that it would not need a license to use the structure, sequence, and organization of the copyrighted compilable code. ... Judge: Do you want all their [Google's] profits? Oracle: No, Your Honor. Judge: This borders on the ridiculous. Now you are changing your tune (adding to the agreed-upon statutory damages). Based on 9 lines of copying out of 15 million? That would ge a big, big stretch. ... Oracle: If we were, as a matter of law, able to seek disgorgement on question 1. Google mistrial briefing tomorrow... Judge: Zero finding of liability so far. On Monday, May 7, 2012 9:56:31 PM UTC+2, phil swenson wrote: > > > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/05/jury-rules-google-violated-copyright-law-google-moves-for-mistrial.ars > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/2fjEkY_0E0IJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
