On Jun 18, 5:03 pm, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Now you are just trolling. That retoric is at a level that wouldn't > > even fly in a high school essay. > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation > > This is not about causation and correlation but about burden of proof. > Please read the past discussions on the subject. Yes it is. You only present casual correlations, no evidence/proof. Also, the "how many end up in court"-argument actually goes both ways, as it may also be an indication of how many can afford to challenge patents. This especially harms "the little guy" and startups. They have no chance, Drew Curtis explains this quite well http://www.ted.com/talks/drew_curtis_how_i_beat_a_patent_troll.html The question of innovation and patents should be answered using academic standards, not courtroom standards. I'll stop feeding now though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
