On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>wrote:
> A much better "plain old" object type, improved collections, and a decent > concurrency library No argument about the first point but I strongly disagree with your next two. I can't think of big holes in the collections (besides closures, which are a language feature, not a library one, so not relevant here). As for the concurrency library... seriously? java.concurrent.util is not just very powerful, it's very well designed and it's running tens of thousands of high volume web sites today. No other library can claim to come close to this, except maybe .net's. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
