On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:03:23 +0200, Simon Ochsenreither
<[email protected]> wrote:
After reading that response I'm not sure whether you have actually read
what I wrote.
Most of the stuff you say was actually explicitly addressed in my comment
already and some of the stuff is more or less beating down a straw man
build up from things I never said.
Isn't it quite ironic that people claim that Java is the more "academic"
ecosystem, when – as soon as some technical points are brought up –
someone
immediately attacks with the same, sore, old
business-pov/popularity/from-authority response?
It's not an attack: it's the reality check that says that in academia you
discuss about what's the better technology on paper, outside academia you
discuss about what's the better technology in the sense that sells more.
Nothing more, nothing less. Frankly, I'm still amazed by the fact that, if
I was in your side, I'd be the first to ask myself: hell, but given that
"my" stuff is better, why isn't selling more? Instead, I don't see the
question, I don't see the answer and only the reiteration about that
technology is still the better one.
For the record I've read your whole post twice, and it was long - with a
reason, because you had many points - mine is shorter, that is just a
couple of questions, did you read them? You're not answering, might I know
why? :-)
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
