> It's not an attack: it's the reality check that says that in academia you > > discuss about what's the better technology on paper, outside academia you > > discuss about what's the better technology in the sense that sells more. > Nothing more, nothing less.
Maybe that's the reason why this mailing list has become such an ghetto. There seems to be no chance to have a sensible, constructive debate about technical topics without people thinking they have to do "reality checks" on other people (and think that's "OK"?). In my opinion, you're not even trying to participate constructively, you make up non-rational requirements instead to kill of discourse. Basically, every technology would need to get more "popular" than Java before you would assess it's technical benefits and disadvantages? Is that right? That's basically what I gather from your comments. > You're not answering, might I know why? :-) > Because I prefer to stay on topic. I try to have an intellectual debate, while you try to turn it into some sort of popularity contest, which I'm – clearly, as indicated – not interested in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/V_q-cLtzTkUJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
