> Whenever you decide to add a complex feature to a language, you generate a > lot of material for papers that you can then submit to conferences. When > you don't have the inclination of publishing papers about your language, > you have much more freedom to refuse to add features (and one could argue > that such languages end up being leaner than academically slanted ones as a > consequence).
It took me approximately 3 minutes to verify that this is non-sense. I find your assumption that the whole mailing list is too lazy or stupid to use Google to get an overview of Scala-related papers a bit disrespectful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/dMxJaNXBMtAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
