On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:27:20 +0100, Casper Bang <[email protected]>
wrote:
However, taking the tin-foil hat off for a moment, it's probably safe
enough for most people to go with the big players like LastPass etc.
I don't want to scare people, of course. But "it's probably safe enough"
is what I often think, when I'm particularly annoyed of my manual
procedure. Then I say: what does enough means? It depends on what you're
protecting. For many things, it's probably enough: you risk some major
annoyance in some public forums if some joker spreads some spam, or you
risk your websites to be defaced. If you have the proper counter-measures
(e.g. a backup to quickly restore a defaced site, etc...), it's ok.
Perhaps I could actually use one of the proposed open source solutions for
my passwords with a low criticality (but I don't see any advantage in just
having them managed by Opera).
For my banking accounts, not. Once the money has gone, has gone.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
