+1 On 18 December 2012 14:46, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote:
> Agreed. > > Personally, I worry a lot more about someone being able to use social > engineering to have one my passwords reset than someone breaking one of my > passwords. > > -- > Cedric > > > -- > Cédric > > > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:33 AM, rakesh mailgroups < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Fabrizio, >> >> i think you are being unrealistic. >> >> I'm all for doing due diligence when choosing important software like >> this (I use 1Password + dropbox btw) but you need to realise their are NO >> 100% guarantees. >> >> Look what happened to Sony, hackers get hold of government data and post >> it. >> >> What I think you should be asking yourself is, will I be able to get any >> money back if I should be hacked? The answer is invariably yes as you are >> already part of the minority who understands technology and isn't stupid to >> use guessable passwords or the same one across multiple sites. >> >> As someone pointed out, you have to trust someone somewhere in order to >> do anything. LastPass, KeyPass, 1Password all have a lot to lose if their >> software is not good enough. Personally, thats good enough for me. They >> should have the smart people staying on top of this situation for me. >> >> Lifes too short, move on. >> >> Rakesh >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Fabrizio Giudici < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:27:20 +0100, Casper Bang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> However, taking the tin-foil hat off for a moment, it's probably safe >>>> enough for most people to go with the big players like LastPass etc. >>>> >>> >>> I don't want to scare people, of course. But "it's probably safe enough" >>> is what I often think, when I'm particularly annoyed of my manual >>> procedure. Then I say: what does enough means? It depends on what you're >>> protecting. For many things, it's probably enough: you risk some major >>> annoyance in some public forums if some joker spreads some spam, or you >>> risk your websites to be defaced. If you have the proper counter-measures >>> (e.g. a backup to quickly restore a defaced site, etc...), it's ok. Perhaps >>> I could actually use one of the proposed open source solutions for my >>> passwords with a low criticality (but I don't see any advantage in just >>> having them managed by Opera). >>> >>> For my banking accounts, not. Once the money has gone, has gone. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s. >>> "We make Java work. Everywhere." >>> http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/**blog <http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog>- >>> [email protected] >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Java Posse" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscribe@** >>> googlegroups.com <javaposse%[email protected]>. >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>> group/javaposse?hl=en <http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en>. >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail: [email protected] gtalk / msn : [email protected] quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright google+: http://gplus.to/thecoda <[email protected]> twitter: @thecoda vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright steam: kev_lee_wright "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
