On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:29:41 +0100, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Casper Bang <[email protected]>
wrote:
For far too long, people (in this group as well) have inflated "open
source" with artificial attributes. It's odd really, because the
wording is
quite precise; the source code is open for inspection, and depending on
the
license, open for modification. However, just how the project is
governed
is out of the scope of any OSS-license that I am aware of.
Couldn't have said it better myself. Open source means... well, you can
read the source. That's it.
Correct. Indeed, we should have adopted the term "Open community" or such
to mean the broader thing.
I guess, BTW, what are the popular projects that can be designed as "Open
community".
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
