tomorrow I decide to build a website that takes credentials.

I don't see if I choose to store the passwords or not, encrypted or not, is
governed by some law. Its not enforceable.

Obviously, as a professional, I would want to make sure the decision I make
does not lead to issues with my business.

When Sony was hacked, no government prosecuted them (I believe).

Rakesh


On 16 January 2013 12:06, Ryan Schipper <[email protected]> wrote:

> Definitely the more purist approach. Less value for investigations.
>
> In reality, Most organisations choose to take the chance on this in order
> to assist investigations when necessary
>
> Smart software could also check whether the username is valid prior to
> including it in the log. Though this could open the possibility of timing
> attacks. The whirling dervish of security strikes  again....
>  On 15/01/2013 10:13 AM, "Josh Berry" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I thought it was actually best practice to not even record the username.
>> Since a very conceivable mistake is to forget to tab over to the password
>> field and then submit the form after typing username and password into the
>> same field.  Perhaps only storing a hash might be safe.
>>
>> Regardless, does seem in the questionable category of even being useful,
>> and instead just opening you up to further attacks.  I view it (in what I
>> do not think of as a controversial view) as the username/password of users
>> is actually valuable information.  As much so as credit card numbers.
>> Treat it as such.
>>
>> (None of this is to say Ryan's answer is incorrect in any shape form or
>> fashion.)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Ryan Schipper <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> As to the legality, I think the correct question is: is it legal to
>>> store the password (as entered or some derived form, such as a hash)?
>>>
>>> Auditing failed login attempts (the username, a timestamp, etc) is an
>>> extremely common practice - in fact, Australian information security
>>> standards require it and common professional security certifications (CISSP
>>> etc) recommend it. I'd be very surprised if it illegal to track this sort
>>> of information within the EU. These logs are invaluable in conducting
>>> internal fraud or security investigations.
>>>
>>> That said, why does the password (in particular) need to be tracked? I
>>> can think of a very good reason not to track it: mistyped passwords.
>>> Consider how many times you mistype your password. If a computer system
>>> were to track my mistyped passwords, the database containing those would
>>> become a treasure trove for internal fraudsters.
>>>
>>> I can't think of a sane security professional that would recommend
>>> tracking passwords in this manner - usernames and timestamps, absolutely,
>>> but not passwords.
>>>
>>> PS. As usual, if you or your client are legitimately concerned, you
>>> should be consulting a practicing lawyer, not a list of Java doods. =)
>>>
>>> -- Ryan
>>>
>>> On 15 January 2013 08:30, Fabrizio Giudici <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:24:35 +0100, Kevin Wright <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  That depends on what you mean by "retain".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suppose he means the credentials are logged, or stored somewhere not
>>>> just in order to re-render a page.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
>>>> "We make Java work. Everywhere."
>>>> http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/**blog <http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog>-
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Java Posse" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscribe@**
>>>> googlegroups.com <javaposse%[email protected]>.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>> group/javaposse?hl=en <http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en>.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Java Posse" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Java Posse" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to