We're using Tomcat (it could be Jetty, I'm killing one by one all the .jsp
I can get my hands on :-)) and I'm using straight Javascript. I've looked
at all the various alternatives but they are not worth the trouble to me.
I'm also using underscore.js to make my life a bit easier (come on, 'for'
loops? What year is this, 1998?).


-- 
Cédric



On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:50 AM, phil swenson <[email protected]>wrote:

> Interesting, Cédric.  Very strong endorsement.
>
> Are you coding in plain javascript or using Coffescrit/Dart/something else?
>
> What is the server side you are developing against?  Java/node.js/?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> And it has come to that - forced into JS development ! Shame ! :-p
> >>
> >> But I've got to admit jquery allows you to pull off tricks that would be
> >> very difficult server side. so there's no escaping it any more. ;-)
> >
> >
> > Actually, the recent crop of binding frameworks (e.g. EmberJS initially
> and
> > more recently, AngularJS) has been dramatically shrinking the amount of
> > jQuery I use these days to the point that it's almost a code smell when I
> > see one. jQuery is still very useful but be aware that you should only
> ever
> > do graphical stuff with it (e.g. animations) and never use it to query
> > values (e.g. calling .val() on a DOM element).
> >
> > One of the many great things about AngularJS is the very clear line it
> draws
> > in your conceptual model: any jQuery directive in your controller code is
> > wrong and should be moved out. jQuery was a great advancement in making
> > Javascript and single page applications more tractable, but I feel that
> > Javascript development has reached a brand new level of maturity with
> > AngularJS. If anything, you should spend more time learning this than
> jQuery
> > (which is pretty trivial in itself).
> >
> > --
> > Cédric
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to