I user TinyMCE in PWC environment without any issues. The only thing it to
place TinyMCE scripts before any other scripts =)))
Felix.
On 12/22/06, Will Merrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sébastien Gruhier wrote:
Hi I had a look to your code. few things
First I tink you should add a "var" before your "win = new Window(winid,
options);"
Then about *window.frames[winname].do_save is not a function *that's weird
but I have to say that I had
an hard time to understand your code. You are going back and forth from
the parent window and the frame.
What I suggest is to use an observer for the close button, it will be
cleaner.
About the URL, do you really need an url? URL is fine if your open
something that is not in your server, else I
will suggest to use ajax. Personnaly, I do not like iframes.
HTH
Seb
Thanks for your reply. Your suggestions are good, but did not affect the
problem.
I did eventually figure out what is going on. It turns out that the *
window.frames[winname]**.do_save* form is not supported in Firefox. I
don't know why it works once, but in general it does not work in Firefox.
Fortunately, the form that does work is *window.frames[n]**.do_save()*where n
is the index where
*window.frames[n].name == winname*.
So *window.frames[n]**.do_save()* does not work, but
* var inx = -1;
for (var i=0; i < **window.frames**.length; i++) {
if(winname == **window.frames**[i].name) {
inx = i;
}
}
if ( inx >= 0 ) {
window.frames[inx].do_save();
}*
does work.
This can be greatly simplified with Prototype to this:
* $A(window.frames).find( function(f) {
return (f.name == winname);
}).do_save();
*which does work on Firefox, IE and Opera.
I absolutely agree with you about not using URL windows if possible. The
reason I am using a URL window in this case is that I am trying to use a
wysiwyg editor to allow my users to edit some content. Of the three open
source editors I've found, none of them play well with others. They all make
assumptions about the environment that make them hard or impossible to
integrate into my prototype/scriptaculous/windows pages. So I launch the
editor in a nice clean environment of its very own and present it on the
page with a URL window. For most of the rest of my work, I load stuff into a
div window as you suggest.
As for the convoluted code, some of that is a result of trying to control
the embedded application across the iframe barrier. That is just messy at
the best of times. But some of it is a result of deficiencies in the 'close'
logic of windows.js. I want to talk to you about these, but since it is
such a big topic, I will do so in another thread.
Thanks for your great work and your continued willingness to help us.
-- Will Merrell
_______________________________________________
Javawin mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.xilinus.com/mailman/listinfo/javawin_xilinus.com
--
Felix
-------------------------
God put me on earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now,
I'm so far behind, I will never die...
_______________________________________________
Javawin mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.xilinus.com/mailman/listinfo/javawin_xilinus.com
