On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Dan Streetman wrote: > > What do you guys think about either creating a new release/package for > example code using javax.usb, or putting it into the common RI? I think a > seperate package would be best, especially if the package names are > different (i.e., not com.ibm...)
I think that would be a great idea. Package could be org.jusb (which you have registered right?) or perhaps org.jsr80 (which we would have to register). > Do you have any sample code? Most is probably too complex, but It would be fairly trivial to cut it down. The question is if we should select a cheap, commonly available device and shouw how to communicate with that? Or if we should only show how to enumerate devices, interfaces etc (as you do in the view, but in a more simplified manner)? //Roger ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ javax-usb-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
