On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Roger Lindsjö wrote: >On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Dan Streetman wrote: > >> >> What do you guys think about either creating a new release/package for >> example code using javax.usb, or putting it into the common RI? I think a >> seperate package would be best, especially if the package names are >> different (i.e., not com.ibm...) > >I think that would be a great idea. > >Package could be org.jusb (which you have registered right?) or perhaps >org.jsr80 (which we would have to register).
I do have org.jusb registered, but not org.jsr80... What about org.javax-usb? > >> Do you have any sample code? > >Most is probably too complex, but It would be fairly trivial to cut it >down. The question is if we should select a cheap, commonly available >device and shouw how to communicate with that? Or if we should only show >how to enumerate devices, interfaces etc (as you do in the view, but in a >more simplified manner)? A mouse might be a good start, most people have that already. Problem is going to be Linux's HID driver which will be driving it...:( I'll create a new CVS tree to put example code in...probably each class shouldn't be too big, just have multiple classes that show different examples. -- Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------- 186,272 miles per second: It isn't just a good idea, it's the law! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ javax-usb-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javax-usb-devel
