Tara,
these are difficult questions.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:53:42 -0800, Talbott, Tara D
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> define the structure of the data.) We were thinking it would be easiest to
> extend an existing java/xml binding compiler to create java classes which
> can parse/retrieve their output values from incoming stream(s).
I understand, that these streams aren't necessarily XML? If so, I have
implemented
a similar thing in the JaxMe predecessor, called Parselets. See
http://jaxme.sf.net/docs/api/de/ispsoft/jaxme/Parselet.html
for a rough idea. Basically, the generator converts the schema into a
set of Parselets.
This hasn't done with JaxMe 2. However, the main ideas are so comparable and the
extensibility of JaxMe 2 is even better than it has been for the predecessor.
> type objects should be easily extensible, our biggest concern is that it
> doesn't support the full schema yet.
That's right. Since this week, we have support for nested groups with
multiplicity <= 1.
More to come, hopefully.
> Also, how is the performance of jaxme?
My believe is, that you won't find a faster parser, which is generated.
> When marshalling does it use lazy binding?
Can you explain what you mean by that?
Jochen
--
Sum. Cogitone?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
