Christophe wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Sorry I keyed the JBase 4 release incorrectly. Should be 4.1 (4.19) > Patch 0758 > > We have had not problem with the jBase 4.1 (T24 R05) so far... We 've > logged a call with Temenos to explain the suddent increase in Modulo > with jBase 5.0. But they are advising us that JBase 5.0 is correct... > Which I cannot believe... Still got the call opened. Thanks for your > feedback. > Then I would ask them the following:
1) If jBASE 5 is correct here, then should not the entire prior base be patched to fix the previous jrf? 2) Why is jBASE 5 correct in oversizing the file 3 or 4 times bigger than it should be? I can only think that someone thought it a good idea to increase the expansion margin by a factor of 3, which makes no sense. If this is indeed what jrf on jBASE 5 should be saying, then the reason why needs to be documented. Files that are too big are not generally a huge overhead, but if you are doing SELECT and READNEXT a lot, then you will have a lot of empty buckets to traverse and a lot of wasted file cache doing it. Jim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Please read the posting guidelines at: http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions specific to Globus/T24 To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
