The problem is solved.
CSHD suggested us upgrade from TAFC R09 SP06 to TAFC R09 SP13 . they
said the problem is not about Journaling files. it is about jlogdup
command bug.

thank you and best regards...


On Aug 21, 4:28 pm, pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Pawel,
>
> The 'new' branches are introduced ( generally ) when there is a
> 'major' change in functionality provided, eg :
>
> A brief ( simplified ) history :
>
> jBASE 4.0 ( the first Temenos release ) was based on jBASE 3.4 ( as
> used by jBASE International customers )
> [ written in purest C ]
>
> jBASE 4.1 ( for both Temenos ( jBASE 4.1.5 ) and jBASE International
> customers ( jBASE 4.1.6 ) ) :
>
>    removed the 'jPML' daemon, used in jBASE 4.0 and jBASE 3.4
>    allowed jBASE processes to be 'EXECUTE'd as threads ( within the
> current process )
>    new licensing mechanism
>    introduced 64bit platforms ( eg HPUX Itanium )
>    added some C++ code ;-)
> etc
>
> jBASE 5 ( jBASE 5.0 for Temenos customers, jBASE 5.2 for jBASE
> International )
>
>  64 bit ( only ) platforms
>  new licensing mechanism
>
> R09 / R10 ( Temenos customers only ) 'naming change' to align with the
> Temenos T24 application 'naming'
>
> The currently supported 'branches' are kept 'in sync', regarding fixes
> for issues where appropriate ( and yes this is an additional
> complication for the support  team ;-(, but I don't believe this as
> incurred additional costs to the customers ;-) )
>
> Generally there have not been any occasions where there was something
> special for 'R09' that is not propagated into R10 and other subsequent
> releases
>
> Pat.
>
> On 18 Aug, 23:15, "Pawel (privately)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pat,
>
> > I though I am reading about branches in SVN :)
>
> > Excuse me for stupid question - but what was a reason for introducing
> > branches of major (jBASE 4 & jBASE 5) releases? I understand that you
> > have branches of major releases and you must (or should) keep them
> > somehow in sync (or will you not?). Will you require to do anything
> > special for R09, but not for R10?
> > I fully understand that jBASE 4 & jBASE 5 are having different codebase
> > (rumours say that jBASE 5 is partially written in C++ - not sure of
> > that).
> > Maintenance of branches will introduce you extra cost if I am not
> > mistaken. Support will (likely) not be cheaper. I do not understand what
> > was the reason behing changing versioning - except clear marketing (but
> > that does not count :)).
> > Clear marketing means - you use R09 - your TAFC is R09. I think that
> > users will not be able to compare easily installations :)
>
> > Kind regards
> > Pawel
>
> > Dnia 18-08-2010 o godz. 22:57 pat napisa (a):
>
> > > Re the jBASE / TAFC release and Change number ( shown in the 'jdiag'
> > > output ) :
>
> > > RELEASE Information         : Major 09.0 , Minor 0.6 , Patch  (Change
> > > 86864)
>
> > > is TAFC R09 SP6
>
> > > RELEASE Information         : Major 5.0 , Minor 22 , Patch 0373
> > > (Change 87455)
>
> > > is jBASE 5.0.22 patch release
>
> > > The Change number(s ) shown, is the last change incorporated in said
> > > release
> > > The change numbering is 'global' across all releases, so for a change
> > > in any branch, beit jBASE 4.1.5, jBASE 5.0, TAFC R09, TAFC R10 etc,
> > > the ( global ) change number is incremented
>
> > > So the change numbers above,  (Change 86864) and (Change 87455),
> > > simply show that R09 SP6 was produced ( at change number 86864 )
> > > before jBASE 5.0.22 was produced ( at change number 87455 )
>
> > > But as the change numbers are independent of the 'branch' ( R09 or
> > > jBASE 5.0 say), then these change numbers do NOT imply that jBASE
> > > 5.0.22 contains additional functionality, features or fixes over and
> > > above R09 SP6
>
> > > Pat.
>
> > > On 18 Aug, 07:30, "FaktoriyeL !" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hi;
>
> > > > Log size issue is very interesting for us. let me explain;
>
> > > > we have two banks in different country that using T24.As I said The 
> > > > first
> > > > bank uses T24 R09 and TAFC. The other bank uses T24 R07 and jbase
> > > 4.1.5.11.
> > > > First bank creates 4 Million records and log size is 11 GB approx for 
> > > > each
> > > > day. The other bank  creates 4 million records and  log size is 3 GB
> > > approx
> > > > for each day. I think this is weird. Because record count is almost 
> > > > same.
>
> > > > And yes we closed some files logging attirube. the files like following.
>
> > > > (and I cannot analyze our log files. because all command (like SELECT
> > > LIST)
> > > > get this error)
>
> > > > F.EB.PHANTOM
> > > > F.ACTIVITY
> > > > F.PROTOCOL
> > > > F.DE.SYSLOG
> > > > F.OS.TOKEN
> > > > F.OS.TOKEN.USE
> > > > F.DE.PHANTOM.LOG
> > > > F.TERMINAL
> > > > F.ENQUIRY.SELECT
> > > > F.ENQUIRY.LEVEL
> > > > F.OS.XML.CACHE
> > > > F.TSA.SERVICE
> > > > F.TSA.SERVICE$HIS
> > > > F.TSA.STATUS
> > > > F.BATCH.STATUS
> > > > F.JOB.TIMES
> > > > F.OFS.MSG.UNIQUE.REF
> > > > F.OFS.REQUEST.DETAIL
>
> > > > and of course $JBCDIR/jbc/jspooler/*
>
> > > > when we used old version of T24 (R06 and jbase 4.1.5) we did not get any
> > > > error message. we upgraded t24 version and jbase version (same time) and
> > > > this issue occurred.
>
> > > > Thank you, Best Regards
>
> > > > 2010/8/18 Pawel (privately) <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > So you should really stress out to CSHD that it is important issue and
> > > > > you really require assistance (you pay for it I belive!). I am sure 
> > > > > they
> > > > > will help you - your Support and Account Managers are first escalation
> > > > > points.
>
> > > > > Logsets 10 GB large from a whole business day is not anything 
> > > > > uncommon.
> > > > > You should however check what you store to logsets. I hope you do not
> > > > > save unnecessary information like F.TSA.STATUS, F.TSA.SERVICE,
> > > > > F.EB.PHANTOM tables. These files you can safely exclude (jchmod -T if 
> > > > > I
> > > > > remember well).
> > > > > Analyse logsets also to check which tables are most popular - perhaps
> > > > > you will find something that you do not need to keep.
>
> > > > > Release information did not tell me much (Major 09.0 , Minor 0.6 , 
> > > > > Patch
> > > > >  (Change 86864)).
> > > > > I think that rebranding jBASE to TAFC and hiding (real?) version 
> > > > > number
> > > > > will only introduce people's confusion. TAFC 9.06 is equal to jBASE 5,
> > > > > right? (which minor release by the way?) :|
>
> > > > > Last thing (just comment): I see that you use gcc as compiler. Is this
> > > > > new default? We (and Temenos I think) are normally using xLC, which is
> > > > > shipped together with AIX.
>
> > > > > I am afraid that I can not help you much. Does issue happen since you
> > > > > upgraded to R09? Has not it been adressed before upgrade?
>
> > > > > Kind regards
> > > > > Pawel
>
> > > > > Dnia 17-08-2010 o godz. 9:33cengizhannapisa (a):
> > > > > > Firstly thank you very much for all your answers.
>
> > > > > > We already have gone to Temenos Support. They wanted our TJ Log 
> > > > > > files
> > > > > > but the log file size is about 10 GB and log counts are about 4
> > > > > > Million. Is this normal? Anyway I sent the files them but they have
> > > > > > not responded yet. we have been waiting for two months.
>
> > > > > > And the other information. We had used jbase4 before jbase5. There 
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > no error. We upgraded our DBMS. And we got these errors.
>
> > > > > > And I am so sorry for your rules. This is first post in this group 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > I didn't know the rules. after that I will be more careful.
>
> > > > > >         jdiag - jBASE diagnostic '$Revision: 1.15 $'
>
> > > > > > System Information
> > > > > > ==================
>
> > > > > > System                      : AIX trkshaix 3.5 000CC802D900
> > > > > > OS Release                  : 5.3.9.0
> > > > > > UNIX User                   : bulent (uid 204, euid 204)
> > > > > > Tty name                    : /dev/pts/76
> > > > > > Time                        : Tue Aug 17 10:22:58 2010
>
> > > > > > Environment
> > > > > > ===========
>
> > > > > > JBCPORTNO                   : Not Set
> > > > > > JBCRELEASEDIR               : '/opt/TAFC/R09'
> > > > > > JBCGLOBALDIR                : '/opt/TAFC/R09'
> > > > > > WARNING: JBCDATADIR is not set, Default '/opt/TAFC/R09/jbase_data'
> > > > > > WARNING: JBCDATADIR is subdirectory of JBCGLOBALDIR
> > > > > > HOME                        :
> > > '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run'
> > > > > > JEDIFILEPATH                : '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run'
> > > > > > JEDIFILENAME_MD             : '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/VOC'
> > > > > > JEDIFILENAME_SYSTEM         : '/opt/TAFC/R09/src/SYSTEM'
> > > > > > RELEASE Information         : Major 09.0 , Minor 0.6 , Patch  
> > > > > > (Change
> > > > > > 86864)
> > > > > > Spooler dir (JBCSPOOLERDIR) : '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/
> > > > > > jspooler'
> > > > > > JBCEMULATE                  : 'prime'
> > > > > > WARNING: Cannot access Executable path '/usr/vac/bin', error 2
> > > > > > WARNING: Cannot access Executable path '/usr/local/bin', error 2
> > > > > > WARNING: Cannot access Executable path '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/
> > > > > > bnk.run/globuspatchbin', error 2
> > > > > > WARNING: Cannot access Library path '/usr/java5/jre/lib/platform',
> > > > > > error 2
> > > > > > Object path (JBCOBJECTLIST) : 
> > > > > > '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/t24lib:/
> > > > > > opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/gdGR0100040lib:/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/
> > > > > > bnk.run/globuspatchlib:/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/lib:/opt/globus/
> > > > > > TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/GR0300108lib:/opt/TAFC/R09/lib'
> > > > > > WARNING: Cannot access Object path '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/
> > > > > > gdGR0100040lib', error 2
> > > > > > WARNING: Cannot access Object path '/opt/globus/TBASLIV/bnk/bnk.run/
> > > > > > globuspatchlib', error 2
> > > > > > jBASE Compiler Run-time     : 
> > > > > > '/opt/TAFC/R09/config/system.properties'
> > > > > > jcompile.ccjbc              : 'gcc'
> > > > > > jcompile.ccjbc.options      : '-fPIC -w -maix64'
> > > > > > jcompile.cc                 : 'gcc'
> > > > > > jcompile.cc.options         : '-fPIC -w -maix64'
> > > > > > jcompile.cpp                : 'g++'
> > > > > > jcompile.cpp.options      
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
Please read the posting guidelines at: 
http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines

IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions specific to 
Globus/T24

To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en

Reply via email to