Tickless kernel shouldn't have any negative impact. This feature was implemented to save power when CPU is in idle mode. I also use tickless kernel and it didn't slow down my dual-core machine.
On Sep 3, 2:16 pm, HF Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 3, 9:05 pm, nonlinear5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Florent reported the 3.75 ratio of improvement on his 4-cpu box. > > That's about what I expected. Something is slowing you down, so yes, a > > "non-tickless kernel" test would be nice. > > Sorry, I overlooked this post when I was searching them. OK, I will > test it as soon as possible. It is not such easy thing to reboot this > machine. I usually restart it once every few months for HW or kernel > upgrade. :) I hope I will be able to test it tomorrow. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JBookTrader" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
