On Sep 4, 5:04 am, nonlinear5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding the GUI overhead, I found it insignificant. What you can do > is to comment out the call to showResults() in the execute() method of > OptimizerRunner. That way, no intermediate results are sent to the > optimization results table, and only final set of results is > displayed. In my tests, it didn't make much of a difference in the > total times.
You are right, it did not make a significant difference. > The other thing to do is to experiment with the CHUNK_SIZE setting in > BruteForceOptimizerRunner. This *does* affect the improvement ratio. I will try to play a bit with it. > points, but it's probably not worth the effort. However, the 3.1 ratio > that HF got seems a little low, so I'd like to get to the bottom of > it. I will test some more things later. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JBookTrader" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
