Have you been able to record 10 level depth data in the FG version for 
the ES without the "freezing" problem?


Florent Guiliani wrote:
> Good Idea. Thus you could not hard code the ponder mechanism and 
> provide a way to override it.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:27 PM, nonlinear5 <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
>     Up until recently, TWS provided up to 5 levels of market depth, and it
>     made sense to calculate depth balance as the difference between
>     cumulative bid size and cumulative ask size. More precisely, the
>     balance was calculated as
>     balance = 100 * (cumulativeBid - cumulativeAsk) / (cumulativeBid +
>     cumulativeAsk);
>     where cumulativeBid is a simple sum of all bid sizes through all 5
>     levels,
>     and cumulativeAsk is a simple sum of all ask sizes through all 5
>     levels.
>
>     Now that we have 10 levels of market depth in TWS, the simple
>     summation of sizes is probably not appropriate. That's because the
>     sizes at the top levels (1 to 5) seem more important than the sizes at
>     the bottom levels (6 to 10), and should be weighted more.
>
>     The question that I ponder is, what kind of weighting should be used?
>     One possible approach is to use a weighting equivalent to the (10 -
>     level). So, the size at level 1 would get a weight of 10, the size at
>     level 2 would get a weight of 9, and so on to level 10 with a weight
>     of 1. This schema would put 10 times more weight on level 1, compared
>     to weight on level 10.
>
>     If you can think of a better weighting mechanism, please post your
>     thoughts here. Once we settle on the weighting, I'll modify the
>     framework to calculate and record weighted balance, in addition to
>     simple balance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Florent,
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"JBookTrader" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to