not yet tried

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Crichton McCutcheon <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Have you been able to record 10 level depth data in the FG version for
> the ES without the "freezing" problem?
>
>
> Florent Guiliani wrote:
> > Good Idea. Thus you could not hard code the ponder mechanism and
> > provide a way to override it.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:27 PM, nonlinear5 <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     Up until recently, TWS provided up to 5 levels of market depth, and
> it
> >     made sense to calculate depth balance as the difference between
> >     cumulative bid size and cumulative ask size. More precisely, the
> >     balance was calculated as
> >     balance = 100 * (cumulativeBid - cumulativeAsk) / (cumulativeBid +
> >     cumulativeAsk);
> >     where cumulativeBid is a simple sum of all bid sizes through all 5
> >     levels,
> >     and cumulativeAsk is a simple sum of all ask sizes through all 5
> >     levels.
> >
> >     Now that we have 10 levels of market depth in TWS, the simple
> >     summation of sizes is probably not appropriate. That's because the
> >     sizes at the top levels (1 to 5) seem more important than the sizes
> at
> >     the bottom levels (6 to 10), and should be weighted more.
> >
> >     The question that I ponder is, what kind of weighting should be used?
> >     One possible approach is to use a weighting equivalent to the (10 -
> >     level). So, the size at level 1 would get a weight of 10, the size at
> >     level 2 would get a weight of 9, and so on to level 10 with a weight
> >     of 1. This schema would put 10 times more weight on level 1, compared
> >     to weight on level 10.
> >
> >     If you can think of a better weighting mechanism, please post your
> >     thoughts here. Once we settle on the weighting, I'll modify the
> >     framework to calculate and record weighted balance, in addition to
> >     simple balance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Florent,
> >
> > >
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Florent,

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"JBookTrader" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jbooktrader?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to