I hear you
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Mulder
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 11:10 AM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Le Challenge: jBoss 2.0 and EJB2.0 support
>
>
> I agree wholeheartedly about 2.0 support. *However*, when you
> discuss the correct appropach at J1, please make sure there's a path to a
> stable and complete jBoss 2.0 with 1.x support on the way to jBoss 3 with
> 2.0 support. I imagine we can achieve that with a selective build process
> where there are separate "build1" and "build2" targets, where the second
> adds more (but less stable) functionality to the first.
> I would *really* like to be able to use a stable, dependable jBoss
> in the short term, and I don't want to sacrifice that for an enhanced
> version much later!
> In any case, I'll help however I can.
>
> Aaron
>
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, marc fleury wrote:
> > Well we are off to javaONE (starting tomorrow), the woodstock
> of computer
> > science.
> > Well when I say we are "off to" i just mean that we will "walk down" to
> > javaONE (we are 3 blocks away;-) (ok rickard and Juha are flying in...).
> >
> > Anyway the point of this brief note is to say that I have been
> dreaming of
> > EJB2.0 support.
> > I believe the power of open source can be clearly proven on a
> project like
> > this one. It seems to me that the current pluggable
> architecture will allow
> > for Multi-Bees operation on EJB 2.0 development. The code base
> is there and
> > the container architecture is solid. We can really grow from
> there, I know
> > it and we need to shift gears and leave the industry behind. I
> also know
> > that mucho folks on the list are waiting for the right occasion
> to jump on
> > the dev bandwagon.
> >
> > Part of what I will do at J1 with Rickard, juha and Norbert is
> figure out
> > how modular the enhancements to the framework are and the
> "time-feasibility"
> > equation thingy and put out a list. We will be heavily
> recruiting in these
> > branches of development.
> > I know that the message beans are not that far (norbert's
> spyderMQ is there
> > already, kudos to him) and that will go in the container, heavy
> duty. The
> > OR stuff is really appealing and there are many enhancement
> that will come,
> > I remember that paper of the other day and we will take a "no-nonsense"
> > approach as we extend ENTity support. EQL is interesting and I
> know there
> > are some "theorists" out there that will have a blast in the
> parsing , query
> > field (norbert did a simple query/intepreter parser for spyderMQ).
> >
> > I hate to sound patronizing, but I profoundly and honestly
> believe that we
> > are in a unique position in time in the server java industry and
> > development. This is infrastructure, under GPL to make sure it
> will remain
> > infrastructure, and we have all the pieces together. A clean, large and
> > understood container code base, a group of highly talented
> developers on the
> > list (most of the industry listening too) and a simple clearly
> understood
> > finite challenge ahead of us in the form of EJB2.0 support.
> >
> > The board will start as many projects, bring on as many people,
> give out as
> > many RW access as needed but like I said, this is the occasion
> to show that
> > Open Source development really is a SCALABLE process, and we will try to
> > demonstrate it yet another time.
> >
> > WE NEED ******YOU******
> >
> > <helmets_down>
> > Let's shift gears...
> > </helmets_down>
> >
> > regards
> >
> > marc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > -------------------------------
> > Visit Telkel at JavaOne(SM), Sun's 2000 Worldwide Java Developer
> > Conference(SM)
> > June 5-9, 2000 - Moscone Center - San Francisco
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
