However we do have grander plans for jBoss 3.0 ;-)

we could do jboss 2.0 with 2 builds, will see...

marc

_________________
"I'm burning up!"
-- DJ kicks--
_________________

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 11:33 AM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Le Challenge: jBoss 2.0 and EJB2.0 support
>
>
> I hear you
>
> marc
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Mulder
> > Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 11:10 AM
> > To: jBoss Developer
> > Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] Le Challenge: jBoss 2.0 and EJB2.0 support
> >
> >
> >     I agree wholeheartedly about 2.0 support. *However*, when you
> > discuss the correct appropach at J1, please make sure there's a
> path to a
> > stable and complete jBoss 2.0 with 1.x support on the way to
> jBoss 3 with
> > 2.0 support.  I imagine we can achieve that with a selective
> build process
> > where there are separate "build1" and "build2" targets, where the second
> > adds more (but less stable) functionality to the first.
> >     I would *really* like to be able to use a stable, dependable jBoss
> > in the short term, and I don't want to sacrifice that for an enhanced
> > version much later!
> >     In any case, I'll help however I can.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, marc fleury wrote:
> > > Well we are off to javaONE (starting tomorrow), the woodstock
> > of computer
> > > science.
> > > Well when I say we are "off to" i just mean that we will
> "walk down" to
> > > javaONE (we are 3 blocks away;-) (ok rickard and Juha are
> flying in...).
> > >
> > > Anyway the point of this brief note is to say that I have been
> > dreaming of
> > > EJB2.0 support.
> > > I believe the power of open source can be clearly proven on a
> > project like
> > > this one.  It seems to me that the current pluggable
> > architecture will allow
> > > for Multi-Bees operation on EJB 2.0 development.  The code base
> > is there and
> > > the container architecture is solid.  We can really grow from
> > there, I know
> > > it and we need to shift gears and leave the industry behind.  I
> > also know
> > > that mucho folks on the list are waiting for the right occasion
> > to jump on
> > > the dev bandwagon.
> > >
> > > Part of what I will do at J1 with Rickard, juha and Norbert is
> > figure out
> > > how modular the enhancements to the framework are and the
> > "time-feasibility"
> > > equation thingy and put out a list.  We will be heavily
> > recruiting in these
> > > branches of development.
> > > I know that the message beans are not that far (norbert's
> > spyderMQ is there
> > > already, kudos to him) and that will go in the container, heavy
> > duty.  The
> > > OR stuff is really appealing and there are many enhancement
> > that will come,
> > > I remember that paper of the other day and we will take a
> "no-nonsense"
> > > approach as we extend ENTity support.  EQL is interesting and I
> > know there
> > > are some "theorists" out there that will have a blast in the
> > parsing , query
> > > field (norbert did a simple query/intepreter parser for spyderMQ).
> > >
> > > I hate to sound patronizing, but I profoundly and honestly
> > believe that we
> > > are in a unique position in time in the server java industry and
> > > development.  This is infrastructure, under GPL to make sure it
> > will remain
> > > infrastructure, and we have all the pieces together.  A
> clean, large and
> > > understood container code base, a group of highly talented
> > developers on the
> > > list (most of the industry listening too) and a simple clearly
> > understood
> > > finite challenge ahead of us in the form of EJB2.0 support.
> > >
> > > The board will start as many projects, bring on as many people,
> > give out as
> > > many RW access as needed but like I said, this is the occasion
> > to show that
> > > Open Source development really is a SCALABLE process, and we
> will try to
> > > demonstrate it yet another time.
> > >
> > > WE NEED ******YOU******
> > >
> > > <helmets_down>
> > > Let's shift gears...
> > > </helmets_down>
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > marc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > > -------------------------------
> > > Visit Telkel at JavaOne(SM), Sun's 2000 Worldwide Java Developer
> > > Conference(SM)
> > > June 5-9, 2000 - Moscone Center - San Francisco
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


Reply via email to