I agree that using what is available instead of building one's own is
smart.
I don't agree that jumping through hoops to do it is always best. I will be
the first
to admit that I am biased by the environment in which I have experience. The
idea of
translating traffic in a environment that handles a nominal 4000 messages a
second is
a little abhorrent.
However, technically you are correct and this will work.
> But we are talking about using corba as a ground on top of which build
> an EJB server. Applications will use the aplication server interfaces and
> not the orb ones. I said corba could be a more robust ground for the
> container but not a more robust environment for the application. I would
put
> my trust in a JTS implemented on top of a tested ots working with a tested
> orb before than in a JTA implementation that was written from scratch and
> integrated in more adhoc ways with some kind of rmi-iiop orb (and here the
> wheel is being reinvented too). Indeed I said CCM could be a more robust
> ground for EJB. Also, I didn't preconize this as the most significant
virtue
> of an EJB implementation using corba.
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
> spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com
