:)))
that's right
be proud of your work!
it kicks ass
love
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard �berg
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 7:37 AM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] rmi,transactions,orbs [was: TransactionImpl]
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Carlos Pita wrote:
> > I really disagree with you in this. Although at the current
> state of the
> > art most orbs could not have, for example, a security level 2 conformant
> > security service, I have taken care of embedding all those
> "eventually"-like
> > words in my posts. My point is that orb bussiness are orb
> bussiness and this
> > should be more and more this way in the not so distant future
> so we should
> > be aware of it (but using a modular approach, with pluggable
> software pieces
> > which eventually -and not necessarily now- take advantage of
> the services).
> > If you put an orb there, someday someone could write a nice
> plugin for some
> > of its services. And the more important part: you are solving the ots
> > integration problem in the more standard way (IMHO).
>
> Sounds like the jBoss container architecture is a perfect ORB then..
>
> > Currently I know that JavaORB has a security service with SL2 and a
> > persistence service that supports persistence via jdbc. They
> also have a lot
> > of other services working and a good CORBA 2.3 orb. They are
> also working in
> > a CCM implementation which will be first released by the last
> days of this
> > month and in a CORBA 3 orb (www.openorb.org).
> >
> > Well, enough about this corba stuff! I think this should be a good
> > solution which inspires some long-term solution feeling (I mean
> in the areas
> > that it covers). But perhaps you want to fix the current jBoss
> transaction
> > module so you are not really interested in orbs right now.
> Please stop me: I
> > would help you with your current implementation.
>
> Well, the thing is that the part that I usually think of when ORB's are
> mentioned is the pure IIOP stuff. And as I've said, I don't mind if
> someone adds IIOP support to jBoss; after all, distribtion *is*
> pluggable. However, the other things are already taken care of thanks to
> the modular architecture of jBoss. jBoss *is* an ORB in the sense that
> you can plug in persistence and security and whatnot.
>
> /Rickard
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.telkel.com
> http://www.jboss.org
> http://www.dreambean.com
>
>
