According to marc fleury: > At the same time I would see for a nice service where you provide a set of > services that are needed for a particular configuration. You would be > notified immediately through a boolean return that all the services you > requested are already on line. Based on experience, I'd suggest that a better way would be to return nothing in case of success, and throw something like ServiceNotAvailableException in case of failure. This simplifies handling - you eventually get bored of checking the booleans, and the code without such checking is cleaner. > marc --vt
- [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Aaron Mulder
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Schaefer, Andreas
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Aaron Mulder
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Juha Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Schaefer, Andreas
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Vadim Tkachenko
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Jay Walters
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Juha Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Vadim Tkachenko
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Jay Walters
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Vadim Tkachenko
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Juha Lindfors
