> Actually, the current ServiceMBeanSupport class, which most services > should subclass, has the states STARTING/STARTED/STOPPING/STOPPED. You > would send out STOPPING first to allow dependent services to stop, and > *then* stop the actual service. Do they have callbacks on those states? if so then that is our interface marc > > I.e. logs would be something like: > Foo stopping > Bar stopping > Xyzzy stopping > Xyzzy stopped > Bar stopped > Foo stopped > ... > In the above example Bar depends on Foo, and Xyzzy depends on Bar. > > /Rickard > > -- > Rickard �berg > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.telkel.com > http://www.jboss.org > http://www.dreambean.com > > >
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Juha Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Schaefer, Andreas
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Vadim Tkachenko
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Jay Walters
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Juha Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Vadim Tkachenko
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Jay Walters
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Vadim Tkachenko
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Juha Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] JMX Status? Schaefer, Andreas
