marc fleury wrote:
mf> you are correct in saying that it should be empty, but for that to
mf> happen differential metadata is needed in EJX.
mf> Rickard said he would take a crack at it, and I believe the empty the
mf> jboss.xml is what needed when we have the differential stuff.
Okay, I'll not commit the empty defaultjboss.xml right now, but
I don't understand your words about differential metadata.
I looked at *MetaData sources and tried to deploy beans with empty
jboss.xml - all works perfectly.
Best regards,
Oleg
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg Nitz
>> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 9:51 AM
>> To: jBoss Developer
>> Subject: Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] EJX
>>
>>
>> marc fleury wrote:
>> mf> Ok it is EJX that uses the old defaultjboss.xml.
>>
>> mf> Rickard can you update the stuff so that it uses standardjboss.xml?
>> Wait a minute, defaultjboss.xml is copied as an original state of
>> jboss.xml for the bean. I thing it should rather be almost-empty than
>> to contain a copy of standardjboss.xml, because jBoss will take from
>> standardjboss.xml all info that is not found in jboss.xml.
>> I was going to commit such almost-empty defaultjboss.xml to CVS, but
>> forgot about it. I'll do this after your consent.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg
>>
>>
>>
>>
