> Okay, I'll not commit the empty defaultjboss.xml right now, but
> I don't understand your words about differential metadata.
> I looked at *MetaData sources and tried to deploy beans with empty
> jboss.xml - all works perfectly.
differential means that the EJX stuff needs to be capable of working from an
empty file and can add only what the user specified (not the ton of stuff it
used to). Yes the beans will deploy since the container metadata is already
differential. Does EJX work with an empty defaultjboss.xml ? I don't think
so... until that is changed at least.
amrc
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg Nitz
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 9:51 AM
> >> To: jBoss Developer
> >> Subject: Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] EJX
> >>
> >>
> >> marc fleury wrote:
> >> mf> Ok it is EJX that uses the old defaultjboss.xml.
> >>
> >> mf> Rickard can you update the stuff so that it uses standardjboss.xml?
> >> Wait a minute, defaultjboss.xml is copied as an original state of
> >> jboss.xml for the bean. I thing it should rather be almost-empty than
> >> to contain a copy of standardjboss.xml, because jBoss will take from
> >> standardjboss.xml all info that is not found in jboss.xml.
> >> I was going to commit such almost-empty defaultjboss.xml to CVS, but
> >> forgot about it. I'll do this after your consent.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Oleg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
