----- Original Message -----
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 11:26 AM
Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Externalized container interceptors patch ready for commit
> | <interceptor
> |transaction="Container">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInsta
> |nceInterceptor</interceptor>
>
> Why does the SSI need to know that the transaction is "Container", in fact
> why do you specify it in the name?
This was just lazy cut and pasting. The StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor should
just use the default value for the transaction attribute which is Both.
>
> how do we change one interceptor I can't see how we can do it "differential"
> we need to specify the full stack (which is ok for now I guess). Also how
> do we specify a new stack, in jboss.xml I would assume, do you have it
> documented? do you have the logic to parse that information in jboss.xml ?
> does it overwrite the standardjboss.xml?
>
> marc
The way it is implemented now, you can override the standard stack in jboss.xml,
but you have to completely specify the container interceptor stack. There is
no support to just change one interceptor. I'll add support for the most common
case of just replacing one interceptor instance with another.
