>
> I think that the DependencyManager is a good one, so I would not be so
> quick to suggest that it be removed.
>
Oh you dont want to start a war again....see dev archives. Yes it is not
bad but I would say it is too explicit and verbose and doesn't do runtime
dependencies. It would be nice to try to develop some solution using
relations from jmx but it is currently not possible, it will be soon.
http://archives.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind0104&L=jmx-forum
Vladimir
> --jason
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, marc fleury wrote:
>
> > why don't you figure it out?
> >
> > let us know if it is depracated...
> > marc
> >
> >
> > |-----Original Message-----
> > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jason
> > |Dillon
> > |Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:24 PM
> > |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |Subject: [JBoss-dev] DependencyManager & jboss.dependencies
> > |
> > |
> > |Is this used anywhere? I could not find anything that read from
> > |'jboss.dependencies' and it looks like the only place where the class
> is
> > |even imported is in org.jboss.Main (though it is not instantiated).
> > |
> > |Just curious if this is just legacy or still needs to be hooked up.
> > |
> > |--jason
> > |
> > |
> > |_______________________________________________
> > |Jboss-development mailing list
> > |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
