Can this change be postponed? Some of us are using code generators and it
would be more than a simple search/replace exercise to accomadate this.
Or, is it possible to set the code such that it works with or without the
java: prefix?
Jim
--On Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:14 AM +1200 Toby Allsopp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:36:38PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> User: starksm
>> Date: 01/04/17 12:36:37
>>
>> Modified: src/main/org/jboss/metadata Tag: Branch_2_2
>> ApplicationMetaData.java
>> Log:
>> Remove the requirement that the res-jndi-name be prefixed with java:
>
> This could break applications that used to work, right? Is this really a
> "bug" that needs to be fixed for 2.2?
>
> I absolutely agree that it's a good idea in 2.3. If this is going into
> 2.2, shouldn't the change note at least warn people that it might break
> things?
>
> Toby.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
