sure... we should spec that out... the interceptor design of Rickard was
kinda cool (a pop/push stack) though so that it works from more than "one"
interceptor I certainly don't want to remove that.
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:26 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor
|
|
|Logging in general is not sufficient in JBoss. I believe we need to move
|to using log4j with some additional priorities so that one can truly
|understand what is going on in arbitrary detail at the flick of a JMX
|switch.
|
|----- Original Message -----
|From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:55 AM
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor
|
|
|> That plugin should really do something about the finally of the invoke
|> method (same with home). Such as "returning from call bla bla"
|>
|> marc
|>
|>
|> _________________
|> Marc Fleury, Ph.D
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> _________________
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
