The LogInterceptor iteself should certainly stay. I just want to replace the
logging calls with log4j based calls and add some additional log calls with
finer priority granularity so that different levels of runtime diagnostics can be
acquired as needed.
----- Original Message -----
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor
> sure... we should spec that out... the interceptor design of Rickard was
> kinda cool (a pop/push stack) though so that it works from more than "one"
> interceptor I certainly don't want to remove that.
>
> marc
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
> |M Stark
> |Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:26 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] LogInterceptor
> |
> |
> |Logging in general is not sufficient in JBoss. I believe we need to move
> |to using log4j with some additional priorities so that one can truly
> |understand what is going on in arbitrary detail at the flick of a JMX
> |switch.
> |
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
