I can't seem to find how the current interceptor architecture plugs into
the local interfaces method invocation. Does this exist?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan OConnor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:39 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Local interfaces prototype
> Hi,
>
> With (much appreciated) help from Jay Walters, I've added a
> prototype for support of local interfaces to CVS. There are many
> aspects of this I haven't tested (e.g. a bean with both local and
> remote interfaces, functionality of the EnterpriseContext, etc.), so I
> was hoping that some of you familiar with the EJB 2.0 spec could
> use them a little and post problems to this list or Sourceforge bug
> tracker... or, of course, fix problems yourself. :-)
>
> I'm not posting this announcement to jboss-user because local
> interface support definitely needs a little time to cook before it
> enters general use. Please help me to cook it. Anyone who
> disagrees with this may go ahead and cross post without further
> discussion. :-)
>
> Just a quick design note for the code reviewers: I modeled local
> interface support on the JRMP container invoker whenever
> possible, so that someone familiar with that code base would
> instantly understand what I was doing. However, I thought it better
> not to add local interface support to the existing pluggable
> ContainerInvoker system. This is because the local interfaces
> implementation can remain constant as the distribution mechanism
> (e.g. RMI/JRMP, CORBA, whatever...) changes. So local interfaces
> are broken out.
>
> Also, you'll notice that I do not publish the home interface in our
> JNDI system, except in a component name space when a bean
> uses an ejb-local-ref. There is no reason to make the home globally
> available, since local interfaces will only work for components
> within an application. So instead, I publish the interfaces to the
> application class.
>
> Finally, I made a small change to the verifier so it doesn't throw an
> exception when a bean without remote interfaces is deployed.
> However, you should know the local interfaces are not verified.
> (Quick reminder: don't throw java.rmi.RemoteException.)
>
> -Dan O'Connor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
