ok I will assume "temp lead" until someone dedicated comes along.
The scope is fairly simple, I believe that the spec calls for on the wire
RMI/IIOP communication so that our proxy must have a RMI/IIOP stub to teh
container, we must generate a RMI/IIOP stub to talk to the container.
I am not sure (and could be wrong) that the lookup can still be in JNP and
that the proxy we pass back still uses the optimizations we have (dynamic
proxy) so that java clients can talk to the server. Does the spec call for
a C++ client being able to talk to our stuff "out of the box" ? or is the
requirement only RMI/IIOP *on the wire* which we can safely do.
Also I remember Rickard was going to some presentations on RMI/IIOP to see
if it would be easy to integrate in JBOSS, I will ping him and see if he has
any input, his ideas are usually pretty good :))
time is end of summer (august) when we would need to have the full 3.0 stuff
going and compliant to the latest spec as much as we can.
regards
marcf
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tahir
|Awan
|Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:16 PM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] soo... RMI-IIOP
|
|
|Marc,
|
|I agree this is really critical and hence suggest the following.
|
|1. You assign a lead from one of core developers
|2. Lead will just define the problem scope and a reasonable completion
|timeframe.
|3. Volunteer writers (me, Ajay etc.) will start working and make sure it
|goes as smooth as possible.
|
|How do u feel about this?
|
|Tahir
|
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:49 PM
|> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|> Subject: [JBoss-dev] soo... RMI-IIOP
|>
|>
|> pardon my 10,000 feet management of this issue but do we have
|> a clear lead
|> on the problem? do we have a small team of writer/reviewers?
|> when do you
|> guys think we can put this in...
|>
|> it is going to be CRITICAL as we go for certification (ooops
|> there I said it
|> again)
|>
|> marcf
|>
|> _________________
|> Marc Fleury, Ph.D
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> _________________
|>
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
