ah yes then it is much more complicated since we need to have ANY client
calling our stuff.
Try getting it to work with StatefulSession beans as that would give you a
good idea of what the Messages we pass around look like.
Rebuilding the MethodInvocation in the node is the goal, whatever you use is
good, do check out the server side of the JRMP invoker to see how we
generate the MI from the RemoteMethodInvocation. Your job will be to
generate the MethodInvocation from the corba message.
BTW I will change the invocation layer as part of JBOSS3.0 but will take
care of porting anything you have in there, let keep in touch.
man you are on your own, I can't say I know jack about CORBA these days, but
I am sure many people in this group will be ready to give you a hand...
marcf
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ajay
|Gautam
|Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:12 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] soo... RMI-IIOP
|
|
|Hello
|
|I have been going through various documents and Sun's
|EJB specs. Thanks to Edwin for providing links and
|thoughts / comments.
|
|Right now, I am in the process of studying how we can
|map IIOP services to the existing JBoss services
|(among other things). I think that would be the best
|way to go. EJB and CORBA are 2 sides of the same coin.
|I believe, we should be able to create interfaces for
|IIOP services that internally call JBoss services.
|Some EJB containers do this the other way round - They
|have ORBs at their core and have interfaces for EJB
|services.
|
|According to the spec, we need to support CORBA (v
|2.3.1) clients thru IIOP(v 1.2)/GIOP(v 1.2). To us
|(JBOss), it would not matter if the CORBA client is
|written in C++ or COBOL or whatever !
|
|Would try my best to make it by August !
|
|Comments / suggestions / queries / thoughts / links /
|resources / moans / groans most welcome :-)
|
|Ajay
|
|--- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> ok I will assume "temp lead" until someone dedicated
|> comes along.
|>
|> The scope is fairly simple, I believe that the spec
|> calls for on the wire
|> RMI/IIOP communication so that our proxy must have a
|> RMI/IIOP stub to teh
|> container, we must generate a RMI/IIOP stub to talk
|> to the container.
|>
|> I am not sure (and could be wrong) that the lookup
|> can still be in JNP and
|> that the proxy we pass back still uses the
|> optimizations we have (dynamic
|> proxy) so that java clients can talk to the server.
|> Does the spec call for
|> a C++ client being able to talk to our stuff "out of
|> the box" ? or is the
|> requirement only RMI/IIOP *on the wire* which we can
|> safely do.
|>
|> Also I remember Rickard was going to some
|> presentations on RMI/IIOP to see
|> if it would be easy to integrate in JBOSS, I will
|> ping him and see if he has
|> any input, his ideas are usually pretty good :))
|>
|> time is end of summer (august) when we would need to
|> have the full 3.0 stuff
|> going and compliant to the latest spec as much as we
|> can.
|>
|> regards
|>
|> marcf
|>
|> |-----Original Message-----
|> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
|> Behalf Of Tahir
|> |Awan
|> |Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:16 PM
|> |To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] soo... RMI-IIOP
|> |
|> |
|> |Marc,
|> |
|> |I agree this is really critical and hence suggest
|> the following.
|> |
|> |1. You assign a lead from one of core developers
|> |2. Lead will just define the problem scope and a
|> reasonable completion
|> |timeframe.
|> |3. Volunteer writers (me, Ajay etc.) will start
|> working and make sure it
|> |goes as smooth as possible.
|> |
|> |How do u feel about this?
|> |
|> |Tahir
|> |
|> |> -----Original Message-----
|> |> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> |> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 1:49 PM
|> |> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|> |> Subject: [JBoss-dev] soo... RMI-IIOP
|> |>
|> |>
|> |> pardon my 10,000 feet management of this issue
|> but do we have
|> |> a clear lead
|> |> on the problem? do we have a small team of
|> writer/reviewers?
|> |> when do you
|> |> guys think we can put this in...
|> |>
|> |> it is going to be CRITICAL as we go for
|> certification (ooops
|> |> there I said it
|> |> again)
|> |>
|> |> marcf
|> |>
|> |> _________________
|> |> Marc Fleury, Ph.D
|> |> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |> _________________
|> |>
|> |>
|> |>
|> |> _______________________________________________
|> |> Jboss-development mailing list
|> |> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |>
|>
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|> |>
|> |
|> |_______________________________________________
|> |Jboss-development mailing list
|> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
||http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|
|
|=====
|** There are no shortcuts to any place worth going **
|
|Ajay Gautam
|
|__________________________________________________
|Do You Yahoo!?
|Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
|a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
