|boolean dirty = true;
|if (isModified != null)
|{
| try
| {
| dirty = ((Boolean)isModified.invoke(ctx.getInstance(), new
|Object[0])).booleanValue();
| } catch (Exception e)
| {
| // Ignore
| }
|}
|
|if (dirty)
| container.getPersistenceManager().storeEntity(ctx);
|
|Am I correct here? Again, let me know if you want me to check in these
|changes...
my question (you dummy) is
do you know that the calls you make (wait my daugther just came in for a
good-night kiss) ...
do you know that that store calls you make do update the flag for the dirty
check... yes I know that the dirty code is in there, which is specifically
why I ask.
marcf
|
|
|Bill
|
|
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|> fleury
|> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 6:13 PM
|> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind<METHOD>
|>
|>
|> hmmmm
|>
|> for example when the real transaction commits, what do you do? do you
|> re-store the stuff? or do you correctly keep track of who is
|> updated through
|> setting the dirty flag?
|>
|> This is good stuff ...
|>
|> marcf
|> ____________________________________
|> "but I think you are moving to fast"
|> -- Some popular rap song --
|> ____________________________________
|>
|>
|>
|> |-----Original Message-----
|> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|> |Burke
|> |Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:33 PM
|> |To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|> |Subject: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind<METHOD>
|> |
|> |
|> |The EJB spec 2.0 reads.... 9.6.4
|> |
|> |"Before invoking the ejbFind<METHOD>(...) method, the container
|> must first
|> |synchronize the state of any entity bean instances that are
|> |participating in
|> |the same transaction context as is used to execute the
|> ejbFind<METHOD>(...)
|> |by invoking the ejbStore() method on those entity bean instances."
|> |
|> |JBoss is not doing this.
|> |
|> |We really needed this change, so I implemented it. Let me know
|> if you want
|> |me to commit it. If I get no response in a few days, I'll just
|commit it
|> |anyways...Isn't that the way it works?
|> |
|> |Summary of changes:
|> |
|> |- Created a new class TxEntityMap that maps transactions to the entities
|> |that are associated with that transaction
|> |- Added an instance to TxEntityMap to EntityContainer
|> |- EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.register(...) associates the
|> transaction
|> |with the entity bean into the TxEntityMap
|> |-
|> |EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.InstanceSynchronization.afterCom
|> pletion()
|> |disassociates the entity with the transaction
|> |- Don't worry, I'm pretty sure I clean up everything.
|> |
|> |Bill
|> |
|> |
|> |
|> |_______________________________________________
|> |Jboss-development mailing list
|> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|>
|>
|> _______________________________________________
|> Jboss-development mailing list
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|>
|
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
