Ah... I did not know that! I've allready moved most of the server over to
log4j. Can I just assume that log4j will be confiurged for me by the
client??
Regards,
Hiram
>From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ and Log4j
>Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:05:01 -0700
>
>The only reason log4j is not used is because no one has done it. Clients
>are
>already required to use log4j if they want integration with the JBoss
>logging
>facility as of 2.4 so that is not a reason.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:09 PM
>Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ and Log4j
>
>
> > Is there any reason why JBossMQ does not use the Log4j api for logging?
>I
> > am having a hard time tracking down this EOFException problem due to
>either
> > the lack of messages or a complete overload of them. If Log4j was used
> > here (with category names set to classnames), I could turn down the
>noise...
> > or at least limit it.
> >
> > The only reason that I can think not to use Log4j is that we then force
> > clients to have Log4j and configure it. Is that such a bad thing?
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
