Before you go crazy on that log system clean up... I'm working on a major
re-org of the jbossmq module. It's so major that everything is broken right
now on my development box :) I'm making all subsytems in jbossmq a JMX
service. This will be good since jbossmq.xml will then be able to go away.
Plus, since marcf is going to make deploying JMX services so easy, doing
things like adding queues and topics will be a snap!
Regards,
Hiram
>From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ and Log4j
>Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 23:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
>
>I am not so sure that is a safe assumption. For example, the testsuite
>does
>not currently setup any logging on the clients. So if JBossMQ used Log4j
>in
>its client code, the current testsuite will produce a lot of garbage
>messages about needing some configuration.
>
>There is also the issue of serialization. Category is not serializable, so
>special care needs to be taken for those classes which need to log, but
>also
>need to be serializable. It is really too bad that they did not do this as
>to avoid the private void readObject(...) overrides that are required to
>make this work.
>
>I have a logging facade which provides all of this niceness and adapts to
>Log4j (and a custom nexus based system that it originally was based on). I
>was going to suggest that we make use of it as soon as I was finished with
>the current refactoring. It provides some convience methods to deal with
>parameter concatination, logging primitives and handling serialization and
>such.
>
>I wanted to fixed up the Log4j integration, perhaps with a simple
>autoconfig, that would setup a PrintLogger or NullLogger where Log4j was
>not
>available on the client side.
>
>Either way, the JBossMQ code should use a more robust logging system. I
>was
>going to blanket replace all of the logging in JBossMQ with Log4j until I
>started running into serialization problems.
>
>--jason
>
>
>On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > Ah... I did not know that! I've allready moved most of the server over
>to
> > log4j. Can I just assume that log4j will be confiurged for me by the
> > client??
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > >From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ and Log4j
> > >Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:05:01 -0700
> > >
> > >The only reason log4j is not used is because no one has done it.
>Clients
> > >are
> > >already required to use log4j if they want integration with the JBoss
> > >logging
> > >facility as of 2.4 so that is not a reason.
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:09 PM
> > >Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ and Log4j
> > >
> > >
> > > > Is there any reason why JBossMQ does not use the Log4j api for
>logging?
> > >I
> > > > am having a hard time tracking down this EOFException problem due to
> > >either
> > > > the lack of messages or a complete overload of them. If Log4j was
>used
> > > > here (with category names set to classnames), I could turn down the
> > >noise...
> > > > or at least limit it.
> > > >
> > > > The only reason that I can think not to use Log4j is that we then
>force
> > > > clients to have Log4j and configure it. Is that such a bad thing?
> > > >
> > > > --jason
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Jboss-development mailing list
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jboss-development mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
