I think we want to use the fully qualified classname. If the bean name is
added it should be appened to the classname. We need to be careful not
to introduce a lot of overhead in obtaining the logging category by
constructing highly dynamic category names.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:46 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] log4j or JBoss logging
> I posted the original message to the wrong forum (user forum), and almost
> lost the responses in all the traffic.
>
> I will switch over to direct log4j soon.
>
> Has anyone given any thought to how we should organize the log categories?
>
> For example, what root are we going to use 'jboss' or 'org.jboss'?
>
> I think we should follow class package name as close a possible, so cmp
> messages would start at 'org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp'.
>
> My current plan is to use
> 'org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.<BeanName>.<JDBCCommandName>'
>
> -dain
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
