> I think we want to use the fully qualified classname.
Ok.
> If the bean name is
> added it should be appended to the classname. We need to be careful not
> to introduce a lot of overhead in obtaining the logging category by
> constructing highly dynamic category names.
>
Are you sure that there is a lot of overhead when obtaining a logging
category? If there is, I will make sure to obtain all categories during
container initialization and not on the fly. I assume that it is ok to
perform expensive operations during initialization.
-dain
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:46 AM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] log4j or JBoss logging
>
>
> > I posted the original message to the wrong forum (user
> forum), and almost
> > lost the responses in all the traffic.
> >
> > I will switch over to direct log4j soon.
> >
> > Has anyone given any thought to how we should organize the
> log categories?
> >
> > For example, what root are we going to use 'jboss' or 'org.jboss'?
> >
> > I think we should follow class package name as close a
> possible, so cmp
> > messages would start at 'org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp'.
> >
> > My current plan is to use
> > 'org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.<BeanName>.<JDBCCommandName>'
> >
> > -dain
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
