ok I see why the big noise.
No please don't make the stuff private and leave it protected there are many
abstract classes throughout the code and making getter/setter calls is just
OO poopoo imho. Plus you are up for a lot of work, cause there is a lot of
it, and it is little gain for us.
If it ain't broken... man work on CMP 2.0 that is *real* stuff ;-)
marcf
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
|Sundstrom
|Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 2:19 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] package level fields
|
|
|Does anyone know why all of the fields in org.jboss.ejb.Application are
|declared with package (default) access? Most of the classes that I have
|looked at in org.jboss.ejb have fields with package access. If
|there is not
|a good reason, I suggest that we make these private as this helps to
|prevent spaghetti code.
|
|I'm willing to change the code, and make sure that all the test run. I
|wouldn't do it right away but in a couple of weeks.
|
|-dain
|
|
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
