on 1-08-10 14.19, Rickard Öberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>> some dreambean stuff - or that was my understanding :
>> 1) becouse it is mentioned on this list (old JBossGUI = closed source)
>
> That's a lie. It's BSD. Download source from
> http://dreambean.com/ejx.html
>
>> 2) when i looked at the distro could not find source - lot of barfing - had
>> to add some obscure .jar
>
> So, does this reasoning apply to all .jar files in JBoss that do not
> have their source in JBoss CVS???
>
> Come on...
>
> /Rickard
I was refering to : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML
on 1-06-25 19.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> yes EJX doesn't really belong here anymore. Also rickard is not supporting
> it, it doesn't really work, and finally they are com.dreambean classes not
> JBoss open sourced.
>From memory I must have confused "not JBoss open sourced" with it not being
open sourced - and at the time I did not se any reference to "Download
source from http://dreambean.com/ejx.html " - my mistake - sorry ...
Thank You for clarifying ...
--
heh ...
This now gives me the opportunity to then *repete* what has been mentioned
before - a general clean up in the module structure - where We do not have
*one ant lib per module* for ex. - would be welcome ... (also that some
modules seem to be outdated and do not have doc's / compile / run this
together with a percived missing active maintainer ... should be addressed)
Please refresh my memory on what is said / thought / done in this area ...
/peter_f
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
